Tomorrow is Valentine’s Day. Whether you’re planning a
romantic evening with your significant other or intend to protest the Hallmarked-out
holiday I think we should talk about romance. Particularly from a Christian point of view.
I find it a bit strange that, in a culture of cliché love songs, romantic
comedies, and a multi-million dollar wedding industry, when it comes to the
Church we have lost all understanding of romantic love for others. Sure, Christianity, and Jesus’ ministry in
particular, is centered on love—we are to love the poor, the less fortunate,
and our enemies. We are to love and honor our parents and we are to remain in
community with the entire Church. And yet, when it comes to marriage,
sexuality, and sexual relations, there is very little mention of romantic love
or the importance of having a true emotional and mutual connection with
another. Spending a lot of time with Christians and seminarians (many
married/in committed relationships) I don’t hear a lot of conversation
surrounding romantic love. We do talk about love – we converse about the Greek
word Agape – a true and unconditional
love for and by God. But, where the hell is Eros? Eros, another Greek word,
most closely identified as a passionate, sensual, and intimate love is not present
in the Bible and rarely comes up in a Christian context.
Now, to be fair, I’m not a romantic person. I’m quite
cynical actually, but I’m still concerned that a lack of romantic love within
the Christian tradition is problematic. Romantic love is about intimacy and
becoming close to another, not just emotionally but physically as well. Romantic
love is the attraction one has for another, it is an excitement and an
enthusiasm, and it is a desire and longing to understand another in a physical,
spiritual, and emotional manner. This romantic love, of infatuation and
complete vulnerability to another, is often passed by when the Church and
theologians talk about marriage or sexual relationships.
As Christians we are seeking out a relationship with Christ
and want to truly know him. However, how can we go about coming to know Christ
in an intimate way, if we cannot even come to know another man or woman in an
intimate way? Romantic love, in all of its dreamy idealism and enthusiasm,
illustrates intimacy in a positive and outward way. Romantic love brings desire
to the forefront, a feeling which at its very nature is religious, not sexual.
Desire is a longing for closeness and intimacy, a yearning, a wanting of more also
desire to know God better, both in God’s humanity and divinity. Integrating
romantic love into the Church and allowing for emotion and vulnerability to
take over a part of our lives makes us more readily available to Jesus Christ.
I want romance, people. Hot, steamy, passion-filled, erotic
romance. And, I think romantic love is possible to incorporate in the Church
and will only help us lead more faithful Christian lives.
This isn’t all that new. Let’s look at the genre of erotic
and courtly love literature of early Christian mystics. My girl Mechthild of
Magdeburg was a rock star at incorporating this language of eroticism and romantic
passion. Here’s just a brief excerpt:
I
cannot dance Lord, unless you lead me.
If
you want me to leap with abandon,
You
must intone the song.
Then
I shall leap into love,
From
love into knowledge,
From
knowledge into enjoyment,
And
from enjoyment beyond all human sensations.
There
I want to remain, yet also want to circle higher still.
(Flowing
Light of the Godhead)
In closing an eye to the use of the word ‘Lord’ as a title
within the reading, the verse could easily be talking about a human lover, who
has filled her with a sense of love and a desire for more. Just as we desire to
be closer to God and come to know God more fully, we long to be one with our
romantic partners. Ideally, a romantic relationship with another culminates
when you reveal your deepest secrets, thoughts, and desires to your partner. Mechthild
has bared her soul; her love with Christ is evolving, and although she remains
in a state of perfection and harmony, she still seeks more. In that same way,
if directed toward a romantic partner, human beings are seeking to share their
journey with someone and to bare their whole self to another. Mechthild
illustrates the same kind of love that many contemporary sources are
illustrating in the modern entertainment industry (an entertainment industry
that seems to thrive off of romantic love). For example, let’s take a look at my other girl T-Swift for a sec:
‘Cause
I don't know how it gets better than this.
You
take my hand and drag me head first, Fearless.
And
I don't know why, but with you I'd dance in a storm
In
my best dress, Fearless.
(Fearless,
Taylor Swift)
In the same fashion that Mechthild talks about submitting to
God (I cannot dance Lord, unless you lead me), Swift sings of submitting to a
romantic lover (You take my hand and drag me head first…). Both verses imply a
sense of chasing after, of gratitude for, and of being in union with another,
for the good of both parties. Both songs also bring about a sense of fulfillment
and absolutely gratification. As
Mechthild says, “and from the enjoyment
beyond all human sensations, there I want to remain,” she really means “cause I don’t know how it gets better than
this,” both in reference to a loving, intimate, and romantic relationship
that has provided the writer with a sense of complete emotional gratification.
Just as Swift’s music is an expression of romantic love in
her life which allows listeners to imagine, formulate, and desire an
all-encompassing love like she describes in her song, a mystic’s use of erotic
language does the same—pushes readers beyond their own limitations toward a
relationship with God.
Romantic love exists, and its existence allows for
individuals to go farther than traditional concepts of love and enter into new,
more intimate engagements with others.It is not the intention of romantic or sexual love to
replace the religious love we feel for God, but it is to include romantic love
as a way to better understand Jesus, ourselves, and our relationships with
others. The fact that this romantic and passionate love has existed within the
tradition of mysticism, and exists today within our romance-obsessed,
Valentine’s Day driven, and candlelit dinner inspired fantasies, is an indication
of the necessity of romantic love in our relationship with God and with others.
Romantic love encompasses both the emotional and the
physical sides of desire, passion, and attraction. Romantically loving someone means caring for them, trusting them, wanting the best
for them, and seeking to join with them in thought and in action. This love
flourishes when one allows oneself to become as vulnerable as possible with
another—in others words completely revealing one’s heart and soul and feelings
to another human being.
Love is everywhere. Listen to the radio, turn on the
television, flip through the Bible. Love is present in the world. The problem
is not that love does not exist or that love is not practiced, but that romantic love is not held to as
high of a standard as other types of love within the Christian tradition.
Inserting romantic and passionate love into the Church’s teachings ables human
beings to harness the often unpredictable and idealistic romantic love found
throughout the media and in fairytales, in a healthy way. Understanding romantic
love as a much deeper and meaningful expression enhances our relationships with
the Divine.
So, tomorrow is Valentine’s Day. Whether you’re single or
taken, take a minute or two to understand romance in your life and how romance
might complement your faith rather than be distinct from it.
Also, write some erotic love poetry. Because, it’s good for
you.
ah, mechthild and her trippy god porn. happy valentine's day!
ReplyDelete